Time Zone:
(UTC+01:00) Oslo

EU ETS increasingly irrelevant and investors exit CDM market en masse, says carbon survey

Emerging markets more optimistic

London (25 March 2013)

 

The EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) “no longer has a significant impact on emission reductions”, according to one in five respondents to Thomson Reuters Point Carbon’s annual carbon market survey. Thomson Reuters Point Carbon is the leading provider of market intelligence, news, analysis, forecasting and advisory services for the energy and environmental markets.

 

The results of the survey – Carbon 2013 – reveal that 20% of respondents said the EU ETS caused emission reductions in the past but has little impact on emissions today. “We attribute this to the weak price signal currently generated by the EU ETS, which saw prices fall to historic lows in 2012” said Emil Dimantchev, Thomson Reuters Point Carbon analyst and author of the report.

 

The long-term outlook for the EU ETS, however, is positive. The majority of the survey’s participants (65%) believe it is likely that EU politicians will adopt the backloading proposal to delay the supply of European allowances. Around half considered the long-term carbon price a decisive factor in investment decisions, in line with past survey results: “These results imply that the majority of market participants assume market reform in their trading and investment strategies”, Dimantchev commented. “If these plans fail, the market will pass a tipping point beyond which both the price and companies’ behavior will be drastically different.”

 

A majority of respondents also believed that the EU will adopt one of the six options to structurally reform the market put forward by the European Commission. These include increasing EU’s emission reduction target to 30%, removing allowances, increasing the cap’s linear reduction factor, extending the scope of the scheme, restricting credit eligibility, and implementing a discretionary price management mechanism. As many as 77% believed the EU will take on a more ambitious reduction target for 2020.

 

Regarding aviation in the EU ETS, half of the survey’s respondents did not expect extra-EU flights to be included in the scheme again. 41% believed that the EU ETS will apply only to flights within the EU after 2013. Dimantchev commented that “the EU is unlikely to cover extra-EU flights again; we expect that the outcome of October’s ICAO Assembly meeting will give the Commission a reason to permanently scale down airlines’ compliance obligation”.

 

Participants in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) reported an unprecedented collapse in activities, and 45% of participants said they were planning to cease CDM investments all together, three times higher than last year. Dimantchev suggested that “surging supply and stagnant demand have driven the market into a period of low prices, which increasingly appears to be irreversible”. Nearly two thirds of respondents showed readiness to turn to the voluntary market. “Projects which can demonstrate high environmental and social benefits in addition to emission reductions will be able to meet the demands of buyers in the voluntary market”, Dimantchev continued.

 

Outside the EU, nascent carbon markets are more optimistic in their outlook. In California, 60% of respondents who have a compliance obligation under the WCI market said they are setting up trading operations, and 53% said they are planning internal abatement. The majority of respondents expected a carbon price around $10-15/t in 2013.

 

In Australia, 65% of respondents believed that the country’s cap-and-trade programme will start as planned in July 2015, despite intensifying opposition from the Liberal Party. “Although the Liberal party is projected to win the election, it appears unlikely that they will be able to repeal the Carbon Pricing Mechanism”, said Dimantchev.

 

Following the passage of cap-and-trade legislation in South Korea, this year’s survey also shed light on the potential for a Korean ETS. Two thirds believed that an emission trading system will be in place by 2015, with three quarters believing a Korean cap-and-trade system will successfully reduce domestic emissions.”South Korean politicians from both main parties see the carbon market in positive light, as carbon market stakeholders in Korea believe the market will spur clean technology innovation” Dimantchev explained.

 

Discouragingly, disappointment with multilateral climate change negotiations increased among survey participants compared to last year. For the first time since Copenhagen in 2009, the majority of respondents felt dissatisfied with the outcome of the latest Conference of the Party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Dimantchev commented: “However, the Doha Climate conference did secure one landmark achievement – to agree on a second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol thereby focusing the further negotiations on the process of reaching a deal on a new international agreement in 2015”.

 

Note to editors

  • Carbon 2013, Thomson Reuters Point Carbon’s eighth annual Carbon Market Survey, ran from ran from 30 January-24 February 2013. The survey garnered 2041 respondents, 1108 fewer than last year, from 97countries. The report provides the most comprehensive overview of the international carbon market to date. It is based on Thomson Reuters Point Carbon's databases and market intelligence, together with the world's largest survey on the carbon market. Questions were asked about current behaviour and future expectations in the areas of the EU ETS, CDM, JI, New Zealand’s ETS, California and Quebec markets, emerging markets in Asia and Australia and, of course, international climate negotiations.
  • Among the respondents, around a third are companies with a compliance obligation under a mandatory cap-and-trade scheme, developers of offset projects, or financial traders involved in trading various compliance carbon instruments.
  • It should be noted that this survey is conducted among individuals that have a significantly more than average interest in carbon markets and policy. Participation is voluntary, and we expect that those most interested in the topic will to a larger extent respond than others. The sampling is thus not representative of the larger population. All interpretations of the survey’s results – which are sometimes surprising – should therefore be read bearing in mind that the sample maybe subject to a bias in favour of carbon. Furthermore, inference to general public opinion should be avoided.
  • The Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change entered into force in February 2005. The Kyoto Protocol motivated the launch of The EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The world’s first international emissions trading scheme, the EU ETS works on a cap-and-trade basis, where the total volume of permitted emissions (the “cap”) is set at the start of a trading period. EU Allowances (EUAs) are the tradable units under the EU ETS, each representing a permit to emit one metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). Up to a certain limit, companies regulated by the EU ETS are also allowed to use carbon credits from third countries (CERs and ERUs) instead of EUAs.
  • Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs) are project credits generated from emission reduction projects in developing countries.
  • Emission Reduction Units (ERUs) are project credits generated from emission reduction projects in industrialised countries.
  • The second phase of the EU ETS ran from 2008-12 and the third phase will run from 2013-20.
  • Backloading is the temporarily withholding of emission allowances due to come to market between 2014-2015.The European Commission has proposed this as a short-term solution to the oversupply in the market. The proposal is currently being discussed in the EU institutions, and a decision could be taken before the summer 2013.
  • The North American markets comprise the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), British Columbia and Alberta.


To see a copy of the survey results, or if you have any questions, please contact:

 

Candida Jones

PR Manager, Thomson Reuters Point Carbon

Mob: +44 (0) 777 5754 763

E-mail: candida.jones@thomsonreuters.com

 

Jake Hemingway

PR Specialist, Thomson Reuters Point Carbon

Phone: +44 (0) 7542 5204

E-mail: jake.hemingway@thomsonreuters.com

 

Emil Dimantchev

Thomson Reuters Point Carbon Analyst

Phone: +47 97 70 98 02

Email: emil.dimantchev@thomsonreuters.com